Peace studies & war studies : un bref panorama des recherches et des formations universitaires
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Irenologie et polemologie sont les deux disciplines scientifiques qui ont pour objet l’etude de la paix et de la guerre. Apres les avoir definies, nous presentons leurs principales caracteristiques epistemologiques : ce sont des sciences sociales et des sciences interdisciplinaires. Leur institutionnalisation est aussi evoquee. Concernant les formations, USA, Canada et Grande-Bretagne ont ete pionniers et sont encore leaders dans ces domaines. Deux formations academiques irenologiques et polemologiques sont presentees. Quant aux recherches, elles sont majoritairement le fait des Nord-Americains et des Europeens du Nord. A la difference des recherches nord-americaines qui ont pris place dans les universites, les recherches europeennes sont apparues dans des instituts independants. Un bref panorama des recherches scientifiques qui sont actuellement menees dans ces deux universites est propose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.027 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.021 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".