MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3168328013

Investor Sentiment and Portfolio Selection

2015· article· en· W3168328013 on OpenAlexaff
Chengbo Fu, Gady Jacoby, Wang Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPortfolioEconomicsVolatility (finance)Efficient frontierMarket sentimentEconometricsFinancial economicsSelection (genetic algorithm)Asset (computer security)Capital asset pricing modelCapital market linePortfolio optimizationVariance (accounting)Stock marketComputer scienceMarket depth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide a theoretical framework to examine how investor sentiment impacts the mean-variance tradeoff. We derive a sentiment-adjusted Markowitz efficient frontier in which investor sentiment alters the first two moments of asset returns, the minimum-variance frontier as well as the Capital Market Line. Our theoretical results are consistent with empirical findings that heightened sentiment-related noise trading activity drives perceived prices away from fundamental and increases market volatility. A rational investor neglecting the effect of investor sentiment may end up selecting a sub-optimal portfolio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic Journal→Same topicFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies→French-language works237,207→