A phase II randomized controlled trial of exercise on biochemical progression in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
5080 Background: Men with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing active surveillance (AS) are at increased risks of cardiovascular death and disease progression. Any intervention that can address these issues during AS would be highly beneficial. Clinical and preclinical studies have demonstrated the benefits of exercise to improve cardiovascular health in cancer patients and suggested the potential role of exercise in suppressing PCa progression in men with PCa undergoing AS. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of exercise on cardiorespiratory fitness and biochemical progress of PCa in men with PCa on AS. Methods: The Exercise During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer (ERASE) Trial was a single-centre, two-armed, randomized controlled trial in Edmonton, Canada. 52 men with localized PCa who were undergoing AS were randomized to high-intensity interval training (HIIT; n = 26) or usual care (UC; n = 26). The HIIT group performed thrice-weekly, supervised, aerobic HIIT on a treadmill at 85-95% of peak cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2peak) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was VO2peak, and the secondary and exploratory outcomes included biochemical progression of PCa (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]), PSA kinetics, and growth of prostate cancer cell line LNCaP. Results: 46/52 participants (88%) completed the postintervention VO2peak assessment and adherence to HIIT was 96%. Compared to UC, HIIT significantly improved VO2peak (adjusted between-group mean difference, 1.6 ml·kg-1·min-1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3 to 2.9; p= 0.014). HIIT also significantly reduced PSA level (adjusted between-group mean difference, -1.1 ug/L; 95% CI, -2.1 to 0.0; p= 0.043) and PSA velocity ( p= 0.040), and suppressed LNCaP cell growth ( p =0.024). No significant differences were found in PSA doubling time ( p= 0.10) and testosterone ( p= 0.24). Conclusions: The ERASE Trial is the first randomized controlled trial to demonstrate the impact of HIIT exercise for improving physical fitness and inhibiting biochemical progression of PCa in men with localized PCa on AS. Our findings suggest that supervised aerobic HIIT may be a promising intervention in this clinical setting. Larger-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted to determine if improvements in physical fitness and PCa-related markers translate into improved long-term clinical outcomes in these men such as disease progression, receipt of radical treatments, posttreatment complications, and survival. Clinical trial information: NCT03203460.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".