Assédio moral na escola: insulto e desejo de reparação moral em uma instituição escolar do Distrito Federal brasileiro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo apresenta os desdobramentos de uma etnografia do assédio moral entre um grupo de professores da educação básica do Distrito Federal brasileiro. Partindo das vivências dos interlocutores de uma pesquisa realizada em 2013, considerei que as palavras e gestos que assediam estão inseridos em um jogo de linguagem específico, o do assédio moral. Por meio da retomada da análise das narrativas de uma das interlocutoras, a professora Rosa, constatei que tais ações constituem um insulto moral sistemático, cuja influência sentida por ela gera a dor e o sentimento de ressentimento, que enseja o desejo da reparação moral. Além disso, a história de Rosa demonstra que as ações de assédio moral observadas entre alguns professores da capital administrativa do país se encontram inseridas na gramática da política local e constituem uma ferramenta utilizada nas disputas políticas por espaços e poderes institucionais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".