MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168437620 · doi:10.1101/2021.05.05.442690

Population analysis of <i>Vibrio cholerae</i> in aquatic reservoirs reveals a novel sister species <i>(Vibrio paracholerae</i> sp. nov.) with a history of association with human infections

2021· preprint· en· W3168437620 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Tarequl Islam, Tania Nasreen, Paul C. Kirchberger, Kevin Y. H. Liang, Fabini D. Orata, Fatema‐Tuz Johura, Monica S. Im, Cheryl L. Tarr, Munirul Alam, Yan Boucher

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAlberta InnovatesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsVibrio choleraeCholeraBiologyLineage (genetic)PandemicPopulationVibrioPhylogeneticsZoologyEcologyMicrobiologyGeneticsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)BacteriaInfectious disease (medical specialty)DemographyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Most efforts to understand the biology of Vibrio cholerae have focused on a single group, the pandemic-generating lineage harbouring the strains responsible for all known cholera pandemics. Consequently, little is known about the diversity of this species in its native aquatic environment. To understand the differences in the V. cholerae populations inhabiting in regions with varying history of cholera cases and how that might influence the abundance of pandemic strains, a comparative analysis of population composition was performed. Little overlap was found in lineage compositions between those in Dhaka (cholera endemic) located in the Ganges delta, and of Falmouth (no known history of cholera), a small coastal town on the US East Coast. The most striking difference was the presence of a group of related lineages at high abundance in Dhaka which was completely absent from Falmouth. Phylogenomic analysis revealed that these lineages form a cluster at the base of the phylogeny of V. cholerae species, sufficiently differentiated genetically and phenotypically to form a novel species. Strains from this species have been anecdotally isolated from around the world and were isolated as early as 1916 from a British soldier in Egypt suffering from choleraic diarrhoea. In 1935 Gardner and Venkatraman unofficially referred to a member of this group as Vibrio paracholerae . In recognition of this earlier designation, we propose the name Vibrio paracholerae , sp. nov. for this bacterium. Genomic analysis suggests a link with human populations for this novel species and substantial interaction with its better-known sister species. Importance Cholera continues to remain a major public health threat around the globe. Understanding the ecology, evolution and environmental adaptation of the causative agent Vibrio cholerae and tracking the emergence of novel lineages with pathogenic potential are essential to combat the problem. In this study, we investigated the population dynamics of Vibrio cholerae in an inland locality which is known as endemic for cholera and compared with that of a cholera free coastal location. We found the consistent presence of the pandemic generating V. cholerae in cholera-endemic Dhaka and an exclusive presence of a lineage phylogenetically distinct from other V. cholerae . Our study suggests that this lineage represents a novel species having pathogenic potential and a human link to its environmental abundance. The possible association with human population, co-existence and interaction with toxigenic V. cholerae in the natural environment make this potential human pathogen an important subject for future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicVibrio bacteria research studiesFrench-language works237,207