Generation, Characterization, and Dissociation of Radical Cations Derived from Prolyl-glycyl-glycine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radical cations of an aliphatic tripeptide prolyl-glycyl-glycine (PGG •+ ) and its sequence ions [a 3 + H] •+ and [b 2 – H] •+ have been generated by collision-induced dissociation of the [Cu(Phen)(PGG)] •2+ complex, where Phen = 1,10-phenanthroline. Infrared multiple photon dissociation spectroscopy, ion–molecule reaction experiments, and theoretical calculations have been used to investigate the structures of these ions. The unpaired electron in these three radical cations is located at different α-carbons. The PGG •+ radical cation has a captodative structure with the radical at the α-carbon of the proline residue and the proton on the oxygen of the first amide group. This structure is at the global minimum on the potential energy surface (PES). By contrast, the [a 3 + H] •+ and [b 2 – H] •+ ions are not the lowest-energy structures on their respective PESs, and their radicals are formally located at the C-terminal and second α-carbons, respectively. Density functional theory calculations on the structures of the ternary copper(II) complex ion suggest that the charge-solvated isomer of the metal complex is the precursor ion that dissociates to give the PGG •+ radical cation. The isomer of the complex in which PGG is bound as a zwitterion dissociates to give the [a 3 + H] •+ and [b 2 – H] •+ ions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".