Automated Generation of Cerebral Blood Flow Maps Using Deep Learning and Multiple Delay Arterial Spin-Labelled MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this work was to develop and evaluate a deep learning approach for estimation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial transit time (ATT) from multiple post-label delay (PLD) arterial spin-labelled (ASL) MRI. Six-PLD ASL MRI was acquired on a 1.5T or 3T system among 99 older males and females with and without cognitive impairment. We trained and compared two network architectures: standard feed-forward convolutional neural network (CNN) and U-Net. Mean absolute error (MAE) was evaluated between model estimates and ground truth obtained through conventional processing. The best-performing model was re-trained on inputs with missing PLDs to investigate generalizability to different PLD schedules. Relative to the CNN, the U-Net yielded lower MAE on training data. On test data, the U-Net MAE was 8.4±1.4 ml/100g/min for CBF and 0.22±0.09 s for ATT. Model uncertainty, estimated with Monte Carlo dropout, was associated with model error. Network estimates remained stable when tested on inputs with up to three missing PLD images. Mean processing times were: U-Net pipeline = 10.77s; ground truth pipeline = 10min 41s. These results suggest hemodynamic parameter estimation from 1.5T and 3T multi-PLD ASL MRI is feasible and fast with a deep learning image-generation approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".