MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168521352 · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2021.682008

Assessing the Electrochemical Stability Window of NASICON-Type Solid Electrolytes

2021· article· en· W3168521352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Energy Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFédération Wallonie-BruxellesFonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’AgricultureFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSUniversité Catholique de Louvain
KeywordsElectrochemistryFast ion conductorElectrolyteLithium (medication)Materials scienceElectrochemical windowElectrodeRedoxDecompositionInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringChemistryPhysical chemistryMetallurgyIonic conductivityOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries (ASSLBs) are promising since they may enable the use of high potential materials as positive electrode and lithium metal as negative electrode. This is only possible through solid electrolytes (SEs) stated large electrochemical stability window (ESW). Nevertheless, reported values for these ESWs are very divergent in the literature. Establishing a robust procedure to accurately determine SEs’ ESWs has therefore become crucial. Our work focuses on bringing together theoretical results and an original experimental set up to assess the electrochemical stability window of the two NASICON-type SEs Li 1.3 Al 0.3 Ti 1.7 (PO 4 ) 3 (LATP) and Li 1.5 Al 0.5 Ge 1.5 (PO 4 ) 3 (LAGP). Using first principles, we computed thermodynamic ESWs for LATP and LAGP and their decomposition products upon redox potentials. The experimental set-up consists of a sintered stack of a thin SE layer and a SE-Au composite electrode to allow a large contact surface between SE and conductive gold particles, which maximizes the redox currents. Using Potentiostatic Intermittent Titration Technique (PITT) measurements, we were able to accurately determine the ESW of LATP and LAGP solid electrolytes. They are found to be [2.65–4.6 V] and [1.85–4.9 V] for LATP and LAGP respectively. Finally, we attempted to characterize the decomposition products of both materials upon oxidation. The use of an O 2 sensor coupled to the electrochemical setup enabled us to observe operando the production of O 2 upon LAGP and LATP oxidations, in agreement with first-principles calculations. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) allowed to observe the presence of an amorphous phase at the interface between the gold particles and LAGP after oxidation. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) measurements confirmed that the resulting phase increased the total resistance of LAGP. This work aims at providing a method for an accurate determination of ESWs, considered a key parameter to a successful material selection for ASSLBs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it