MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168521477 · doi:10.15353/cjo.v83i2.4023

Dix conseils pour améliorer ses publications sur Instagram

2021· article· fr· W3168521477 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Will Cowan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

P Dix conseils pour amliorer ses publications sur Instagram Will Cowan En tant que crateur de contenu pour Marketing4ECPs, Will Cowan imagine et produit des vidos pour des cabinets d'optomtrie partout en Amrique du Nord. Communiquez avec Will sur le site marketing4ecps.com.. I nstagram est l'une des plateformes de mdias sociaux les plus populaires, comptant prs de 500 millions d'utilisateurs qui s'y connectent chaque jour. Toutefois, cette multitude de voix entrane un dfi auquel chaque cabinet d'optomtrie doit faire face : se dmarquer et exercer une influence. Ce ne sont pas toutes les images qui vhiculent une histoire pertinente, alors jetons un coup d'oeil aux 10 conseils essentiels pour des publications sur Instagram qui se distinguent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.010
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometrySame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207