MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168523150 · doi:10.1017/9781800102286.002

A Mislocated Battlefield? Battle Flats: The Battle of Stamford Bridge, 1066

2021· other· en· W3168523150 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Architecture and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattleBattlefieldBridge (graph theory)EngineeringHistoryAncient historyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Battle of Stamford Bridge, fought 25 September 1066, was a decisive victory for the English led by Harold Godwinson over an invading Norwegian army commanded by Harald Sigurdsson. Although details of the battle have been debated for decades, the location of the battlefield is traditionally believed to have been a large meadow located east of the Derwent River near the town of Stamford Bridge known as Battle Flats. Original written sources that describe the battle do not mention Battle Flats nor is there any archaeological evidence that confirms it as the location of the battle. Despite this lack of evidence, most scholars have based their interpretations and reconstructions of the battle on the premise that the local tradition referencing Battle Flats is correct. This paper will demonstrate why this premise may be incorrect and suggest a more credible location west of the Derwent River at Halifax Meadow that aligns more closely with events as described in English, Anglo-Norman and Scandinavian accounts of the battle. According to local tradition, the Battle of Stamford Bridge was fought east of the Derwent River in a meadow referred to as Battle Flats. The commonly accepted narrative has the battle beginning in a meadow west of the Derwent River, progressing across Stamford Bridge, where a lone Norwegian defender reportedly held up the entire English army before being killed, and ending at Battle Flats. The dearth of reliable archaeological information has forced scholars to rely primarily on original written sources for reconstructions of the battle. Original sources, however, do not reference the actual location of the battlefield. Rather, as DeVries notes, they are “vague on the topography of the battlefield, indicating only the prominence of the Derwent River, a tributary of the Ouse River, running through the battlefield with a narrow wooden bridge running over it.” The general acceptance of Battle Flats as the location of the battle appears to have been based on a single line in Manuscript C of The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle . According to the chronicler, “Then Harold, king of the English, moved against them by surprise beyond the bridge, and they clashed together there and were fighting very hard long into the day.” However, this passage may possibly have been misconstrued. As Plummer explains, the phrase “beyond the bridge” must be viewed “from the point of view of the enemy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2380.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedieval Architecture and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207