MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168564329 · doi:10.4000/ifha.11374

Ulrich Pfister, Jan-Otmar Hesse, Mark Spoerer, Nikolaus Wolf (dir.), Deutschland 1871, Die Nationalstaatsbildung und der Weg in die moderne Wirtschaft

2021· article· de· W3168564329 on OpenAlexaff
Ute Engelen

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2021
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean history and politics
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet ouvrage a été rédigé pour l’anniversaire des 150 ans de la fondation de l’Empire allemand à la suite d’une initiative de la commission d’histoire économique du Verein für Socialpolitik. 28 auteurs dont des professeurs, mais aussi de plus jeunes chercheurs y ont participé. Le recueil présente des nouvelles recherches économiques sur l’Allemagne au XIXe siècle, prenant comme point de repère l’année 1871. Bien que l’objectif soit d’expliquer la coïncidence de la formation de l’État allemand...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicEuropean history and politicsFrench-language works237,207