MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168633652 · doi:10.11159/cdsr21.005

A Generic Model for Resilient Dynamic Systems

2021· article· en· W3168633652 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference of Control, Dynamic systems, and Robotics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicComplex Systems and Decision Making
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resilience is a concept unfamiliar to biology, sociology. It simply says about how a biological system and social system can recover from catastrophic disturbances that may come from both internal and external and may be incident and accident. Engineering resilience has raised attention in the early 1990s after the 911 disaster. Engineered systems refer to any system that is built from humans, such as manufacturing system, robotic system, and so forth. A considerable number of studies are conducted on engineering resilience. In this paper, we propose a generic model for resilient dynamic systems. We shall first propose a set of structural characteristics of a resilient dynamic system in the modern technological context, namely digitization and artificial intelligence. We shall then give a summary of engineering resilience research in literature, and then outline this generic model. We will show applications of this generic model to robotic manufacturing systems upon the modern technological context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it