Spatial-Reuse-Based Efficient Coexistence for Cellular and WiFi Systems in the Unlicensed Band
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the increasing data traffic in the fifth-generation (5G) communication system, the 5G new radio extended to unlicensed bands (5G NR-U) has become a promising approach to relieve the heavy pressure on the cellular system. To achieve the efficient coexistence with the WiFi system and improve the efficiency of temporal, spectral and spatial resource utilization, we first divide the transmission space into two subspaces by leveraging spatial reuse, where the data transmitted by cellular user equipments (UEs) falls into one subspace and the data transmitted by Internet of Things (IoT) devices coexisting with WiFi users through power control is in the other subspace. Then, the coexistence among cellular UEs, IoT devices, and WiFi users is formulated as an optimization model with the aim of maximizing the cellular system throughput via the joint power and subchannel allocation under the interference constraint. Although the resulting optimization problem is a mixed-integer nonlinear programmming, we decompose it into two subproblems and develop an alternating iterative approach to effectively solve them. Also, the closed-form allocations of the power and subchannels are obtained. Simulation results confirm that the proposed scheme can improve the cellular system performance and guarantee the coexistence in the unlicensed band.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".