MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3168649737 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-6464

Idealized Numerical Modelling of Internal Waves Through Density Staircases

2021· article· en· W3168649737 on OpenAlexaff
Mikhail G. Schee, Nicolas Grisouard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPycnoclineInternal waveStratification (seeds)GeologyThermohaline circulationArcticGeophysicsGravity waveMixed layerSea iceMechanicsWave propagationClimatologyOceanographyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arctic Ocean contains a warm layer originating from the Atlantic Ocean below the pycnocline which has a thermohaline staircase structure that inhibits vertical mixing. If this heat were to rise to the surface, the rate of sea ice loss would increase dramatically. Wind stress and ice floes generate internal waves which can cause vertical mixing. As the ice cover in the Arctic continues to decline, it will be important to predict how these changing internal waves propagate through such stratification profiles. Here, we investigate how density staircases enhance or limit downward near-inertial wave propagation. We use direct numerical simulations to solve the Boussinesq equations of motion using spectral methods. We simulate the propagation of internal waves through a vertically stratified fluid which includes one or more steps (i.e., mixed layers). We find that we reproduce the results of laboratory experiments showing transmission and reflection of internal waves from one or two mixed layers. We then extend our parameter regime to simulate the propagation of internal waves through a more realistic stratification profile tending toward that of the Arctic pycnocline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→