MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168698109 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2021.3074991

Content Delivery Analysis in Cellular Networks With Aerial Caching and mmWAVE Backhaul

2021· article· en· W3168698109 on OpenAlexafffund
Wei Wang, Nan Cheng, Yiliang Liu, Haibo Zhou, Xiaodong Lin, Xuemin Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBackhaul (telecommunications)Stochastic geometryCellular networkComputer scienceTelecommunications linkComputer networkWirelessNon-line-of-sight propagationWireless networkProbabilistic logicBase stationTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate the successful content delivery (SCD) performance in the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) integrated terrestrial cellular networks, where the caching-enabled UAVs are dispatched to offload the burst traffic from the cellular networks. Specifically, the UAV and terrestrial cellular network share the same spectrum resources for user downlink communications and each UAV uses millimeter wave (mmWave) communications for self-backhaul. We derive a closed-form expression of the achievable rate of the mmWave wireless backhaul link and then analyze the minimum cache hit probability to achieve a certain backhaul rate requirement. By approximating the general probabilistic line-of-sight (LoS) propagation model as a LoS ball model, we analyze the conditional SCD probabilities by leveraging stochastic geometry tools. Simulation results demonstrate that the UAV integrated cellular network can not only provide more access opportunities but also achieve higher SCD performance than the conventional terrestrial network for ground users. Moreover, there exists an optimal UAV density and height to maximize the SCD performance. Our results provide useful guidelines for the design and deployment of future UAV-assisted networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207