Impact of Coastal Reclamation on Environmental Sustainability and Tourism-Based Economy on the North Coast of Java
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coastal reclamation has been increasingly growing in Indonesia is done by multiplying natural resources and economy in coastal management for the welfare of the surrounding community. The research objective is to determine the potential of coastal reclamation land in Coastal residents that is sustainable and to reconstruct a just marine environment reclamation policy. This research can be broadly grouped into the realm of the socio-legal approach. The results of the research showed that the potential for marine reclamation on the north coast of Jawa for business development and tourism areas for the welfare of the surrounding community. Since 2014, the authority of the sea and the coast has become the authority of the provincial government. The authority and supervision of the regional government are reduced, considered detrimental for the life of the coastal community which is the majority of fishermen. Hence, the policy reconstruction of marine environment reclamation is carried out by reconstructing the value of policies in the form of making policies that genuinely involve community and reconstructing the laws and regulations that are still in force.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it