MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168773458

Le souvenir de Na Geralda à Lavaur : du catharisme à l’animisme ?

2012· article· fr· W3168773458 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hervé Terral

Bibliographic record

VenuePersée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La ville de Lavaur dans le Tarn (10 000 habitants), ancien siège d’évêché et ancienne souspréfecture, célèbre depuis plusieurs décennies déjà un douloureux moment de son histoire : sa prise par Simon de Montfort et le massacre qui s’ensuivit lors de la Croisade des Albigeois (1211). La fin brutale de sa châtelaine Na Geralda, jetée dans un puits, tient lieu de symbole : sur l’emplacement de l’ancien château, le Plô, un monument, prenant les formes de la colombe cathare, en porte témoignage et une cérémonie du souvenir s’y déroule régulièrement fin mai sous les auspices de la Société archéologique. Dans cette « cité cathare », titre aujourd’hui fortement revendiqué en Languedoc aux alentours du huitième centenaire de la Croisade (1209), l’année 2008 aura vu l’émergence de rituels animistes lors de la cérémonie du souvenir, en présence d’Amérindiens canadiens, états-uniens, guyanais, unis aux Occitans pour la défense de la Terre-Mère et des droits des peuples indigènes… C’est ce syncrétisme politique et religieux que nous nous proposons d’analyser comme une étape significative dans l’histoire de cette commémoration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.011
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePersée (Ministère de lEnseignement supérieur et de la Recherche)Same topicMedieval European Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207