MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168774926 · doi:10.18192/rceh.v44i1.5903

Subversiones de la literatura testimonial centroamericana: Noviembre de Jorge Galán

2021· article· es· W3168774926 on OpenAlex
José Sánchez Carbó

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTestimonialHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El escritor salvadoreño Jorge Galán en la novela Noviembre (2015) aborda el asesinato de seis jesuitas, un hecho que definió la historia reciente de El Salvador. En un marco amplio, la novela puede inscribirse en la llamada literatura testimonial, que, en el contexto centroamericano, durante las décadas de los años setenta y ochenta, se convirtió en un género canónico. No obstante, la novela de Galán subvierte las convenciones genéricas de este repertorio tanto en su forma como en su finalidad. Desde esta perspectiva se analizará cómo la forma y el propósito de esta novela amplían las posibilidades de la literatura testimonial. Noviembre amalgama una diversidad de estrategias propias de géneros de escritura referencial con estrategias plenamente literarias para constituirse como una expresión de literatura de lo real.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it