Swimming capability of target fish from eight hydropower stations in China relative to fishway design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The four major Chinese carp (MC), Schizothorax fish species (SF), and Cobitidae fish species (CF) are the most important target fish species in China. The swimming behaviour study of three target fish groups is the key to Chinese fishway designs. The 20 min critical swimming speed (Ucrit-20 min) and endurance of the target fish species in relation to body length, swimming speed, and water temperature were estimated using multiple linear regression. The results indicated that both fish body length and water temperature had a significant effect on swimming capability. Performance comparisons indicated that SF were remarkably strong swimmer. CF possess slightly greater swimming capability than MC. The entrance velocity of the upstream fishway should be greater than Ucrit-20 min, but less than maximum swimming speed to make the flow out of the fishway noticeable. The maximum swimming distance could be estimated using endurance model at flow velocity of 1.2 m·s–1. For the downstream-migrating juvenile fish, it was suggested that the flow velocity of turbine intake should be less than maximum sustained speed avoiding entering turbine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".