MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3168882496 · doi:10.1080/00083968.2021.1899949

Covert racism: the case of Ghanaian immigrant entrepreneurs in three Canadian Prairie Provinces

2021· article· fr· W3168882496 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Amos Nkrumah

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africaines · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacismCovertImmigrationSociologyInstitutional racismGender studiesCriminologyPolitical scienceLawLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The manifestation of racism comes in two forms: overt and covert. While overt racism constitutes a blatant expression of discrimination against minorities, covert racism is a subtler form of racial discrimination that is often disguised. Canada’s Constitution and federal policy commitments to multiculturalism have resulted in a general diminution of overt structural forms of racism. Despite these norms, covert racism remains intractable. The impact of covert racism is manifested in various forms on visible minorities including denial of assistance, especially in service institutions. Using in-depth interviews, this paper explores Ghanaian immigrant entrepreneurs’ encounters with covert racism in the Canadian Prairie Provinces. The study finds that subtle racial discrimination through racial profiling and colourblind racism has negatively affected their business operations such as loss of clients. The paper concludes that even though overt racism has become unacceptable in Canada, covert racism continues to undermine economic success and growth for immigrant entrepreneurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of African Studies / Revue canadienne des études africainesSame topicMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207