D’or et d’argent : les jardins incas dans les descriptions de Garcilaso de la Vega (1609)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le Coricancha, complexe sacré des Incas dédié au Soleil, et dans les palais royaux se trouvait un jardin composé de plantes et d’animaux fabriqués entièrement en or et en argent. La mémoire de ces oeuvres a uniquement survécu grâce à la littérature coloniale, qui s’est occupée de les décrire jusqu’aux marges du fantastique dans les Comentarios Reales de l’Inca Garcilaso de la Vega. C’est dans la construction textuelle que fait celui-ci des jardins incas que le lecteur est confronté à un véritable jeu intermédial où, de manière télescopique, s’imbriquent les différents niveaux de représentation du jardin. Dans cet article, nous décortiquerons les multiples dimensions par lesquelles Garcilaso de la Vega parvient à créer une image complexe et universaliste du jardin inca, à la fois jardin artistique, cosmique et impérial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".