MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Antitumor effects of local anesthetic agents in vitro and in vivo.

2021· article· en· W3169039496 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lucillia Bezu, Alejandra Wu Chuang, Allan Sauvat, Sylvère Durand, Fanny Aprahamian, Wei Xie, Juliette Humeau, Fabrice Barlési, Oliver Kepp, Guido Kroemer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBristol-Myers Squibb Canada
KeywordsMedicineProgrammed cell deathPharmacologyCancer researchApoptosisBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e15091 Background: Local anesthetics (LA) are often used during surgery in order to control postoperative pain. Observational retrospective studies showed a significant and unexpected decrease of relapse and increased overall survival after LA injection during solid cancer removal. We hypothesized that LAs used as stand-alone treatment or combined with conventional anticancer therapy may induce cytotoxic effects on cancer cells and trigger antitumor responses against dead-cell antigens. Methods: Cell stress and cell death modalities were investigated in vitro by means of specific biosensors in human osteosarcoma (U2OS) cells after treatment with LAs such as bupivacaine, chloroprocaine, levobupivacaine, lidocaine, ropivacaine and prilocaine. Moreover tumor growth and overall survival were studied in solid tumor models (MCA 205 fibrosarcoma) established in immunocompetent C57Bl/6 mice treated under general anesthesia with LAs (lidocaine or ropivacaine) alone or combined with immune checkpoint blockade (anti-PD-1). Ethical Committee: CEEA IRCIV/IGR n°26, French Ministry of Research, Ref:16946/2018100309413893v2. Results: In vitro, the tested LAs triggered autophagy and induced all arms of the integrated stress response including the phosphorylation of eIF2alpha, the activation of ATF4, the splicing of XBP1 and the proteolytic cleavage of ATF6. Cell stress was followed by apoptotic cell death, and both were inhibited when eIF2alpha kinase 3 (EIF2AK3) was genetically removed by CRISPR/CAS9, while the removal of EIF2AK1, EIF2AK2 and EIF2AK4 had no effects on cellular demise. LAs also triggered mitochondrial dysfunction, mimicking the effect of mitochondrial uncouplers (such as rotenone and CCCP) characterized by respiratory chain and inhibition of a mitochondrial transmembrane enzyme (carnitine-acylcarnitine translocase). In vivo, LAs induced effective tumor growth reduction and improved survival of immunocompetent but not immunodeficient mice, suggesting the ignition of anticancer immune responses. These anticancer immune effects were significantly potentiated when LAs were combined with PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade. LAs and mitochondrial uncouplers failed to induce anticancer effects in MCA205 tumors that were unable to induce ER stress (due to EIF2AK3 knockout) or autophagy (due to AtG5 KO), suggesting that both premortem stress responses are indispensable for inducing anticancer immunity. Conclusions: LAs induce EIF2AK3-dependent cancer cell stress including autophagy and the integrated stress response, which is followed by mitochondrial toxicity and cell death both in vitro and in cancers established in mice. These effects trigger therapeutically relevant anticancer immune responses that can be further potentiated by means of PD-1 blockade. These preclinical observations suggest that the use of LAs during oncological surgery improves clinical outcome by inducing anticancer immunity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseFrench-language works237,207