MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A proposal for the dynamic strain interpolation on hydroelectric turbine runner

2021· article· en· W3169075852 on OpenAlexaff
Quang Hung Pham, Martin Gagnon, Jérôme Antoni, Antoine Tahan, Christine Monette

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsAndritz (Canada)Hydro-QuébecÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)KrigingTurbineHydroelectricityComputer scienceRange (aeronautics)Process (computing)Component (thermodynamics)EngineeringMechanical engineeringArtificial intelligenceAerospace engineeringMachine learningElectrical engineeringMotion (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The large operation range of hydroelectric turbine, caused by the increasing changes in the electrical network usage, leads to higher dynamic stress fluctuation on runner. However, the experimental data cannot cover all the possible operating conditions. The missing data in some turbine operation zones generates a challenge for the recovery of the highest dynamic strain. This paper proposes a methodology for the interpolation of such strains between operating conditions by using the kriging method. The case study focuses on the interpolation of the part load rope which is an important component in the dynamic strain of a Francis turbine runner. Two interpolation approaches, inspired by spatio-temporal kriging and cokriging, are applied and compared. Finally, some suggestions are proposed to improve the recovery of operating conditions using interpolation process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207