Revisión de los parámetros técnico-operacionales del riego de plantaciones citrícolas con máquinas de pivote central
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recovery of citrus activity in Cuba is one of the priorities of the State for which an update of their development program was presented, being known that a quarter of the amount for required investments corresponds to irrigation systems. Thus, some citrus companies in the country are promoting citrus plantations of some tens of hectares where the use of center pivot irrigation machines is foreseen. However, differently from other crops, the use of this irrigation technique for citrus is not an extended practice both in Cuba and worldwide, so with the knowledge on the subject, its design and operation are difficult. Therefore, in this paper technical-operational parameters of citrus irrigation with center pivot machines in clay soils of Cuba was analyzed through of a review of the most relevant literature on the subject, so to provide the first guiding elements for future researches. As a result, a modified form of its mathematical expressions is proposed, which considers the effect produced on the soil wetting pattern by the recommended disposition for the sprayers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it