NOVEL SHOCK MICROSTRUCTURES IN ACCESSORY MINERALS FROM THE HAUGHTON DOME, DEVON ISLAND, NUNAVUT, CANADA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 23 km-diameter, ca. 24 Ma Haughton Dome impact structure in the Canadian Arctic on Devon Island, Nunavut (89deg41W, 75deg22N) occurred within a two layered target composed of a shallowly-dipping ~1700 m thick succession of Paleozoic limestones and evaporates overlying ca.1.9 Ga high grade gneisses [1, 2]. Within the structure a well preserved impact melt bearing breccia unit contains a variety of shocked clasts from the pre-impact sediments and basement gneisses [3]. Due to their high level of preservation a variety of studies have been undertaken on the clast population of the melt bearing breccia, including characterization of shock within the accessory minerals of the basement lithologies [4, 5]. This study presents high resolution electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) microstructural data for zircon and monazite from historic samples of the basement gneiss, in which bulk shock pressures have been previously constrained based on major phases [4, 6]. Shocked zircon and monazite grains have been investigated from shock stage 1b (sample 72110), 2 (7273) and 3 (7192, Dig-9) [4, 6]. At lower shock levels zircon displays planar microstructures consistent with mechanical shock {112} twin formation [7] and deviatoric transformation to the high pressure polymorph reidite [8]. Zircon grains from shock stage three show a more chaotic microstructure with multiple orientations of tightly spaced sets of reidite that are variably recrystallized to zircon neoblasts. Monazite from lower shock stages contains a number of mechanical twin orientations that are indicative of shock deformation [9]. At higher shock pressures a lath like structure of interlocking twin orientations has been identified. This microstructure is suggestive of a reversion transformation from a high pressure polymorph [10] and is the first evidence for the transformation of monazite during shock.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".