MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3169180740

『아메리칸 환갑』에 나타난 디아스포라의 의미 변화 연구

2018· article· ko· W3169180740 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
조숙희

Bibliographic record

Venue미국학논집 · 2018
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Culture and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaMeaning (existential)ImmigrationAlienEmigrationSociologyDiversity (politics)Gender studiesFace (sociological concept)PoliticsPolitical scienceHistoryEthnologyAnthropologyLawSocial scienceCitizenshipPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today, Korean American playwrights actively participate in enriching cultural and social diversity of the North American countries such as USA and Canada. One of their favorite motifs in their plays is the diasporic experience of the Koean immigrants into the New Continent. American Hwangap by Lloyd Suh deals with Chun Min Seok--a Korean man who emigrates to the States, returns to Korea, and then goes back to the States again. After three migrations, he finally decides that the home in the USA is the place he really belongs to. Witnessing the process while his children as well as Chun suffer from various diasporic hardships leads one to realize that the meaning of diaspora has been changing from that of the past. If the original meaning of diaspora is the people or experiences the immigrants have to face in alien places as a result of political scapegoats, modern diaspora is more often than not created by those who are willing to emigrate to new places for economic reasons. Therefore, American Hwangap shows the extended and transformative meaning of diaspora.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue미국학논집Same topicAsian Culture and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207