On symmetry breaking of dual polyhedra of non-crystallographic group <i>H</i> <sub>3</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study of the polyhedra described in this paper is relevant to the icosahedral symmetry in the assembly of various spherical molecules, biomolecules and viruses. A symmetry-breaking mechanism is applied to the family of polytopes {\cal V}_{H_{3}}(\lambda) constructed for each type of dominant point λ. Here a polytope {\cal V}_{H_{3}}(\lambda) is considered as a dual of a {\cal D}_{H_{3}}(\lambda) polytope obtained from the action of the Coxeter group H 3 on a single point \lambda\in{\bb R}^{3}. The H 3 symmetry is reduced to the symmetry of its two-dimensional subgroups H 2 , A 1 × A 1 and A 2 that are used to examine the geometric structure of {\cal V}_{H_{3}}(\lambda) polytopes. The latter is presented as a stack of parallel circular/polygonal orbits known as the `pancake' structure of a polytope. Inserting more orbits into an orbit decomposition results in the extension of the {\cal V}_{H_{3}}(\lambda) structure into various nanotubes. Moreover, since a {\cal V}_{H_{3}}(\lambda) polytope may contain the orbits obtained by the action of H 3 on the seed points ( a , 0, 0), (0, b , 0) and (0, 0, c ) within its structure, the stellations of flat-faced {\cal V}_{H_{3}}(\lambda) polytopes are constructed whenever the radii of such orbits are appropriately scaled. Finally, since the fullerene C 20 has the dodecahedral structure of {\cal V}_{H_{3}}(a,0,0), the construction of the smallest fullerenes C 24 , C 26 , C 28 , C 30 together with the nanotubes C 20+6 N , C 20+10 N is presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".