LPPM UMSB ISSN 1693-2617 56 PENERAPAN SANKSI ADAT KAWIN SASUKU DI NAGARI MUARO SUNGAI LOLO KABUPATEN PASAMAN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marriage one quarter is a that can undermine the customary system , married the connected blood according to lineage mother , the one of clan, or one who one quarter. Writing this research on a such by the community muaro the lolo river, Pasamanregency that ignores the wedding ban one quarter agreed with between uncle that is in the territory.Type research mate one quarter phenomenon is the type case study .A case study is an approach to study , explained or interpret a case ( case ) in the context of him in natural without is the intervention of outsiders .Tekhnik election informants using method ( purposive sampling ) . One theory that analyze sanction players one quarter marriage is theory conflict coser said that conflict derived from the disappointment of special claim occurring in relations and than expected possible aimed at object considered disappointing . The causes of the marriage one quarter in the muaro the lolo river Pasaman regency namely: a ) absence of the sense of like same like , b ) lack of supervision of parents and uncle on social relations nephew children , c ) uncle see in terms of material course , d ) in order to avoid immoral world . Many people are disappointed and unable to pay a fine to the customary like this resulting in negative thing as below: ( 1 ) suicide those who do not getting married , ( 2 ) stress those who do not getting married and so are married but failed to pay fines and psychological pressure excommunicated , ( 3 ) out of their is forever with a vengeance not going to marry their children with the in the muaro the lolo riverPasaman regency in this territory . Keywords: sanctions , customary , marriage
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it