MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GEOHealth Hub Colombia: achievements and challenges of an environmental and occupational health collaboration initiative

2020· article· en· W3169435912 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura Andrea Rodríguez-Villamizar, Álvaro J. Idrovo

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Public healthPolitical scienceEconomic growthPublic relationsEnvironmental healthMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Global Environmental and Occupational (GEO) Health Hub Colombia is a collaboration initiative between academics and professionals from public and private institutions. The objective of this initiative is to promote high quality research, training, and discussion around fundamental topics of environmental and occupational health in the country, and to provide advice for the formulation of sound policies regarding high-priority environmental and occupational health threats.The GEOHealth Hub Colombia began in 2012 as a bi-national project between Colombia and the United States, funded under the GEOHealth program of the National Health Institute / Fogarty International Center. The project identified environmental and occupational health experts in the country, who contributed to identify research and training needs in this area. Since 2015 the GEOHealth Hub Colombia has been working to promote collaborative research between different regions of the country and internationally. One of the main achievements has been to scale up local problemas to the national level and develop multicity research projects, including activities of Colombian peace process related with socioenvironmental topics. Recently, the GEO Health Hub Colombia was awarded the first and only environmental health research program funded by the Colombian Government. The program will be conducted with the collaboration of 10 local universities, regional and national health and environmental authorities, and academic institutions from Brazil, Canada, and Mexico. The main challenge of the research collaboration is the lack of a common platform for exchanging data, ideas, discussions, and to provide information to the different audiences: academics, policy makers, and community.The GEOHealth Hub Colombia also has generated discussion spaces and position public documents related to environmental threats, such us the use of aerial spray of glyphosate to eliminate illicit crops in rural areas. In this regard, support of international societies is needed to face GEO threats in developing countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.208
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207