MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Long Duration Bed Rest Modifies Cardiovagal Baroreflex Control but not Baroreflex Control of Muscle Sympathetic Action Potential Activity in Humans

2021· article· en· W3169456534 on OpenAlexafffund
Tyler D. Vermeulen, Stephen A. Klassen, Steven De Abreu, Danielle K. Greaves, Philippe Arbeille, Pierre Denise, Richard L. Hughson, Hervé Normand, J. Kevin Shoemaker

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space AgencyDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesEuropean Space AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsBaroreflexMicroneurographySupine positionMedicineCardiologyBed restHeart rateBlood pressureInternal medicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our understanding of altered neuro‐cardiovascular control following long‐duration inactivity via head‐down bed rest (HDBR) is incomplete. Here, we retrospectively analyzed two long‐duration HDBR studies, including female (n=17; 32±5 years) and male (n=16; 29±7 years) cohorts, to determine whether HDBR 1) alters spontaneous cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (cBRS) similarly between males and females and 2) alters spontaneous baroreflex control of muscle sympathetic action potentials (AP) in males. Heart rate (HR; electrocardiogram) and arterial blood pressure (BP; finger‐plethysmography) were continuously measured during 5‐minutes of supine rest prior to and following 60‐days bed rest in a ‐6° head‐down position. Spontaneous cBRS was assessed by the relationship between R‐R interval and systolic BP analyzed using the linear regression sequence method. Recordings of multi‐unit muscle sympathetic nerve activity (peroneal microneurography) were obtained and a continuous wavelet transform detected APs which were grouped into AP clusters with similar morphology (n=10, all males). Baroreflex threshold for AP cluster discharge was assessed by linear regression analysis of the relationship between AP cluster discharge probability and diastolic BP. No change in resting HR (64±9 versus 66±9 /min, P=0.12) or mean BP (91.2±9.0 versus 90.6±9.2 mmHg, P=0.73) occurred after HDBR. Reductions in cBRS after HDBR (‐4.1±9.4 ms/mmHg, Time effect: P<0.01) were similar between males and females (Time‐by‐Sex effect: P=0.51) and not related to changes in total blood volume (r 2 =0.045, P=0.24). Grouped AP clusters demonstrated heterogenous arterial baroreflex threshold gain according to AP cluster morphology (Cluster effect: P<0.01) which was unaltered following HDBR (Time‐by‐Cluster effect: P=0.43). In summary, males and females similarly attenuate cBRS following 60‐days of HDBR and novel evidence indicates HDBR does not alter spontaneous baroreflex control of muscle sympathetic APs in males.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207