Análise da efetividade da Ação Pública frente às exponenciais receitas de royalties do pré-sal : – Estudo de caso de Ilhabela-SP
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From the beginning of the massive exploration in 2017 of the oil fields located in the Santos Basin, notably Sapinhoa and Lapa, the municipalities that, by right, receive oil royalties and special stakes, were and are being greatly favored pecuniaryly. In this context, the city of Ilhabela-SP stands out, which, according to indicators, is by far the most per capita, reaching budget levels of tourist cities located in developed countries such as Daytona Beach (United States) and Kelowna (Canada). However, it is noted that social indicators do not go with such budgetary robustness, considering the Indice de Efetividade da Gestao Municipal, sanitation reports, education and environment indexes, while spents with concerts and events are relevant. This paper aims to analyze whether the current model of royalty sharing among Brazilian municipalities is contributing or not to the effectiveness in public actions, according reports made by the Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Sao Paulo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".