MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Ure2 αCap Is Required for GATA Factor Responses to Rapamycin, But Not Nitrogen Limitation

2013· article· en· W3169606758 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jennifer J. Tate, André Feller, Isabelle Georis, Evelyne Dubois, Terrance Cooper

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthFiducie de Recherche sur la Foret des Cantons-de-l'Est
KeywordsRegulatorGATA transcription factorTranscription factorDephosphorylationCell biologyBiologyChemistryPhosphorylationGeneticsPhosphataseGenePromoter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ure2 is a phosphoprotein and central negative regulator of nitrogen‐responsive Gln3 and Gat1 localization and their abilities to activate transcription. This negative regulation is achieved by forming Ure2‐Gln3 and Ure2‐Gat1 complexes which sequester these GATA factors in the cytoplasm of cells cultured in excess nitrogen. Ure2 itself is a dimer, the monomer of which consists of two core domains and a flexible protruding αcap. Here, we show that alterations in this αcap abolish rapamycin‐ (Rap‐) elicited nuclear Gln3 and, to a more limited extent, Gat1 localization but have little effect on the Gln3 and Gat1 responses to nitrogen limitation. Rap is a specific inhibitor of the global regulator, TorC1. Ure2 dephosphorylation is also stimulus‐specific, occurring after Rap treatment, but only minimally if at all in nitrogen‐limited cells. In contrast to Gln3, Rap‐elicited Ure2 dephosphorylation is independent of Sit4 and PP2A. Our data suggest that distinct regions of Ure2 are associated with the receipt and/or implementation of signals calling for cessation of GATA factor sequestration in the cytoplasm. This in turn is more consistent with the existence of distinct pathways for TorC1‐ and nitrogen limitation‐dependent control of GATA factor localization and function than it is with these stimuli representing sequential steps in a single regulatory pathway. Supported by: NIH GM‐35642–23, COCOF, FRFC 2.4547.11.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207