MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3169658890

Se requiere una auditoria internacional sobre la gestión de la pandemia

2020· article· es· W3169658890 on OpenAlex
Academia de Ciencias de Nicaragua

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvío: publicación mensual del Instituto Histórico Centroamericano · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunication and COVID-19 Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)GeographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Academia de Ciencias de Nicaragua organizo en agosto un seminario internacional sobre la realidad del Covid-19 en Nicaragua. En el encuentro intercambiaron informacion y experiencias 21 cientificos, diez nicaraguenses y once de Estados Unidos, Canada, Brasil, Colombia, Argentina, Honduras y Costa Rica. Analizaron tambien la politica que requiere nuestro pais ante la pandemia y elaboraron una serie de recomendaciones para mejor hacerle frente. Este es el texto que salio del seminario, con algunas cifras actualizadas en octubre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it