MO463EVIDENCE OF MICROALBUMINURIA AND ESTIMATED GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE DECLINE AS CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE RISKS IN NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE PATIENTS: META-ANALYSIS OF COHORT STUDIES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims Recent evidences showed an association between NAFLD and extrahepatic manifestations such as chronic kidney disease (CKD) although the result is still inconclusive. This study aims to measure the association of microalbuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline as CKD risks in NAFLD patients. Method Comprehensive searching using predefined queries was done through online databases Pubmed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, and The Cochrane Library to include all relevant literature until November 2020. We included all cohort studies of NAFLD patients diagnosed by ultrasonography (USG), commutated tomography (CT), or scoring system fatty liver index (FLI) that reports microalbuminuria and eGFR decline below 60 ml/min/1.73m2. Bias risk was assessed by The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies. Analysis of this study was performed to provide pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using random-effect heterogeneity test. Results We included 10 cohort studies met our criteria. Analysis of 6 NAFLD cohort studies diagnosed by USG is significantly associated with eGFR decline (pooled HR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.11, p=0.006, I2=88%), while NAFLD patients diagnosed by FLI also showed significant association with eGFR decline (pooled HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.64, p<0.0001, I2=0%), thus overall analysis combined with CT diagnostic modalities showed significant association between NAFLD and eGFR decline (pooled HR=1.53 95%CI 1.29-1.80 p<0.00001 I2=82%). Microalbuminuria risk is significantly increased in NAFLD patients (pooled HR = 1.93, 95% CI 1.39 to 2.67, p<0.0001, I2=0%). Surprisingly, NAFLD patients whose increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) has higher eGFR decline risk (pooled HR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.92, p=0.04, I2=78%). Conclusion Microalbuminuria and eGFR decline are associated as CKD risks in NAFLD patients. However, further studies are still needed to establish the causality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.026 | 0.045 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.015 | 0.061 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".