Phenotypic performance and associated QTL of ‘Peace’ × ‘CDC Stanley’ mapping population under conventional and organic management systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Identification of consistent QTL in both conventional and organic management systems is a prerequisite for improving spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) through marker‐assisted selection. The objectives of the present study were to continue investigating the effect of management systems on agronomic and end‐use quality traits, and map associated quantitative trait loci (QTL) in a hard red spring wheat population. We evaluated 165 recombinant inbred lines derived from ‘Peace’ × ‘CDC Stanley’ for nine agronomic and end‐use quality traits under conventional and organic management systems for 2 yr and genotyped them with the wheat 90K iSelect array. Using inclusive composite interval mapping on phenotypic data across two environments per management and the International Wheat Genome Sequence Consortium (IWGSC) RefSeq v2.0 physical map of 1,058 informative single nucleotide polymorphisms, we uncovered 32 QTL (17 under conventional and 15 under organic) associated with nine traits of which five QTL were common in both managements. The remaining QTL were specific either to the conventional (12) or organic (10) managements. Each QTL explained from 1.2 to 19.2% and together accounted for 3.0 to 28.4% and 3.3 to 21.9% of the total phenotypic variance of each trait evaluated under conventional and organic management systems, respectively. We found three coincident genomic regions on chromosomes 1B, 3B, and 4B associated with two and three traits. All QTL identified in the present study were not reported in any of our previous mapping populations and would provide more data to wheat researchers conducting similar studies under conventional and organic management systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".