MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3169735042 · doi:10.1002/rem.21689

The in situ treatment of Basic Violet 16 synthetic dye in groundwater

2021· article· en· W3169735042 on OpenAlexaff
Rick McGregor, Anastasia Maziarz

Bibliographic record

VenueRemediation Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooSequoia Environmental Remediation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterAquiferDissolved organic carbonEnvironmental scienceWastewaterWater treatmentSewage treatmentEnvironmental engineeringTotal organic carbonContaminationWaste managementEnvironmental chemistryChemistryGeologyEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Synthetic dyes have been shown to be micropollutants in various aquatic and groundwater systems, often occurring at milligram per liter (mg/L) concentrations. Synthetic dyes are typically introduced into the environment either as a continuous stream from wastewater or as episodic events related to the disposal of residues or spills generated during the manufacturing process. Various studies for the treatment of synthetic dyes have been undertaken for wastewater but studies for the in situ treatment of synthetic dyes in groundwater are limited. A pilot‐scale test was conducted to determine if the use of colloidal activated carbon (CAC) could effectively reduce dissolved concentrations of the synthetic dye Basic Violet (BV 16 ) in groundwater using in situ methods. The pilot test was carried out downgradient of a textile manufacturing facility where historic disposal practices resulted in the release of various chemicals of concern including BV 16 to an unconfined silty sand aquifer. A 10‐weight percent CAC solution was injected into a series of temporary direct push injection points to target the synthetic dye that was present at concentrations of up to 1,640 micrograms per liter (μg/L) during the 738‐day study. The results from the pilot test indicated that the CAC was effectively delivered to the target injection zone resulting in a three order of magnitude increase in total organic carbon (TOC) concentrations compared to preinjection TOC concentrations within the aquifer. Distribution of the CAC within the targeted injection zone indicated that heterogeneity affected the distribution with a zone of higher horizontal hydraulic conductivity (K H ) having an average TOC concentration approximately 100 percent greater than the mean TOC concentration within the surrounding aquifer targeted by the CAC injection. Analyses of the groundwater chemistry before and postinjection indicated that the CAC had no detrimental impact on the groundwater quality while reducing the concentration of dissolved BV 16 within the plume to below the method detection limits within 62 days of injection. The concentration of BV 16 remained below the method detection limit of 10 µg/L for the 738‐day duration of the study apart from one detection of 180 µg/L at Day 183 within groundwater sampled from one monitoring well suggesting that the CAC was effective in attenuating the BV 16 over the short and moderate term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemediation JournalSame topicArsenic contamination and mitigationFrench-language works237,207