Modeling the duration and size of wildfires using joint mixture models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fire duration and fire size are key outcomes for quantifying the survivorship of extended attack fires, here considered to be fires with duration greater than 2 days and size greater than 4 ha. Past studies suggest that these key outcomes are correlated. As well, fire behavior, linked to hidden effects, tends to yield that fires arise from different subpopulations. Indeed, it is not unusual for fire behavior to be identified as arising from normal or extreme subpopulations, for example. Here, we embed these two concepts into a new framework for jointly modeling fire duration and fire size. We develop a bivariate finite mixture framework that can be used to model duration and size with four subpopulations of the outcomes whereby duration and size are either normal or extreme. We utilize a shared random effect model as well as a bivariate Gaussian mixture model for such mixture modeling. We also incorporate the effect of explanatory variables associated with each fire event, on the posterior probability of the component that the fire belongs to, through a Dirichlet model. In an analysis of fire outcomes from British Columbia, Canada, we find that the majority of the fires are of normal or extreme magnitude in both outcomes, with strong evidence indicating correlation between duration and size. The effect of fire center, month, and several environmental covariates are identified as key predictors and we are able to determine through these approaches how these covariates differentially affect the four subpopulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".