Le pouvoir du discours oral dans Splendeurs et misères des courtisanes d’Honoré de Balzac
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article a pour objet la manière dont la communication orale, dans un grand roman de l’écrit, permet à des personnages de la marge de se négocier une nouvelle place dans l’espace social. Plus spécifiquement, nous examinerons les figures de Jacques Collin et de ses complices – des femmes dont les ressources discursives sont mises de l’avant, et qui, suivant les plans de Collin, se trouvent dans des situations où elles peuvent renverser les rapports de classe. C’est le cas, par exemple, lorsque le baron Nucingen est berné tout à tour par Esther, Europe et Asie. Notre hypothèse consiste à voir, dans le roman, un partage du pouvoir social entre la sphère orale et écrite du discours, qui se conclut, malgré la puissance de l’écriture dans le système social, par la victoire de Collin. Ainsi, les personnages usant stratégiquement de la communication orale auraient les moyens de bouleverser l’ordre social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".