Jóvenes de Telebachillerato y alfabetismos digitales. Entre el acceso y la desigualdad
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: En el artículo, develamos prácticas de escritura realizadas por un grupo de jóvenes que asisten a un Telebachillerato Comunitario utilizando los dispositivos tecnológicos para comunicarse, relacionarse e interactuar a través de mensajes en los que alternan una variedad de lenguajes, símbolos, imágenes con textos.La perspectiva de alfabetismos digitales nos convoca a redefinir la cultura escrita, ya no solamente como la adquisición de la técnica del sistema de escritura, sino como actos que cuestionan las prácticas impuestas en la escuela.Las alfabetizaciones hoy implican prácticas y sentidos distintos a los que se evocan en la visión nostálgica de la escuela tradicional.La Investigación Tallerista fue una apuesta de trabajo horizontal, dialógico y colaborativo con agentes educativos.La narrativa oral y escrita, un recurso metodológico para escuchar las lecturas del mundo escolar.La categoría de interacción permitió articular aspectos como la comunicación, la relación intersubjetiva y los símbolos de carácter social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".