MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3169932400 · doi:10.1049/ell2.12243

Dual segmentation approximate multiplier

2021· article· en· W3169932400 on OpenAlexaff
Ling Li, Issam Hammad, Kamal El‐Sankary

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplier (economics)Dual (grammatical number)Computer scienceMathematicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This letter proposes a new design for a dual segmentation approximate multiplier. The proposed approximate multiplier uses the static segment method (SSM) to select an initial multiplication segment. Following that, the dynamic segment method (DSM) is utilized to further reduce the initial segment size. Using only the DSM segmenter leads to reduced performance gains. Therefore, the proposed multiplier uses a mixture of the SSM and DSM approaches. Compared to the DSM approach, the proposed design can reduce the energy by 37.90% for 32‐bit multipliers, and by 16.68% for 16‐bit multipliers. The DSM and proposed multipliers have almost identical accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.718

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics LettersSame topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207