MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3169949006 · doi:10.1049/itr2.12082

A priority tree based coordination method for intelligent and connected vehicles at unsignalized intersections

2021· article· en· W3169949006 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Intelligent Transport Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersection (aeronautics)Computer scienceScheduling (production processes)Traffic conflictTree (set theory)Intelligent transportation systemReal-time computingTransport engineeringFloating car dataMathematical optimizationEngineeringTraffic congestionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Intelligent and connected vehicles are believed to be the future solution to traffic management, especially in highly challenging areas such as intersections. In this paper, a priority tree based coordination method is proposed for intelligent and connected vehicles at unsignalized intersections. First, a dynamic scheduling method is used to generate the crossing order of the vehicles, considering the conflicting relationship, waiting time, and arrival time of the vehicles. Then a conflict resolution method is presented to handle the spatial and temporal conflicts among the vehicles inside the intersection. And the simulation results show that the method can generate collision‐free traffic flows as well as improving the traffic performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it