Caching Transient Content for IoT Sensing: Multi-Agent Soft Actor-Critic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Edge nodes (ENs) in Internet of Things commonly serve as gateways to cache sensing data while providing accessing services for data consumers. This paper considers multiple ENs that cache sensing data under the coordination of the cloud. Particularly, each EN can fetch content generated by sensors within its coverage, which can be uploaded to the cloud via fronthaul and then be delivered to other ENs beyond the communication range. However, sensing data are usually transient with time whereas frequent cache updates could lead to considerable energy consumption at sensors and fronthaul traffic loads. Therefore, we adopt Age of Information to evaluate data freshness and investigate intelligent caching policies to preserve data freshness while reducing cache update costs. Specifically, we model the cache update problem as a cooperative multi-agent Markov decision process with the goal of minimizing the long-term average weighted cost. To efficiently handle the exponentially large number of actions, we devise a novel reinforcement learning approach, which is a discrete multi-agent variant of soft actor-critic (SAC). Furthermore, we generalize the proposed approach into a decentralized control, where each EN can make decisions based on local observations only. Simulation results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed SAC-based caching schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".