MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3170033833

Automatic migration path exploration for multivalent battery cathodes using geometrical descriptors

2021· article· en· W3170033833 on OpenAlexaff
Felix T. Bölle, Arghya Bhowmik, Tejs Vegge, Ivano E. Castelli

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
FundersDanmarks Frie Forskningsfond
KeywordsBattery (electricity)Path (computing)CathodeComputer scienceGeologyMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsProgramming languagePower (physics)Thermodynamics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stable and fast ionic conductors for magnesium cathode materials have the prospect of enabling high energy density batteries beyond current Lithium-ion technologies. So far, only a few candidate materials have been identified leading to data only being scarcely available to the community. Here, we present a systematic study, in the framework of Density Functional Theory, including the estimation of the migration barrier for 16 materials through employing Nudged Elastic Band (NEB) calculations. By introducing a path finder algorithm based on the idea of Voronoi tessellations, we show that an estimate of the transition state configuration can be extracted automatically prior to running NEB-calculations. Using geometrical descriptors in combination with a principal component analysis it is possible to further sub-group the migration paths. This approach also extends to materials which are not part of the study, making it a viable approach to more efficiently explore crystal structures with distinguishable migration characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU)Same topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207