Disconnectivity Social of Conflict in the Circle of Iron Ore Mine in Bone Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conflict is a common occurrence in mining activities that ignore the triple bottom line principle. Neglecting the impact of environmental damage and the welfare of the communities around the mine has resulted in social disconnection leading to conflict. This study aims to describe comprehensively the social disconnect in the iron ore mining project in Bontocani District so that mining conflicts do not occur. The research method used is a mixed-method with a sequential design starting with qualitative methods then followed by quantitative methods. The findings of this study indicate that the causes of social disconnect include: There are environmental impacts that damage the livelihoods of residents around the mine area, the company does not respect local wisdom, the role of government is not maximal as a mediator, The economic impact is in the form of loss of livelihoods in the agricultural sector which is exacerbated by road infrastructure. damaged and Social impact in the form of jealousy between residents. The practical implication of this research is the creation of a harmonious relationship between the government, companies and communities in mining management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".