MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design of real time system to measure the voltage signal in high voltage power supply

2021· article· en· W3170078259 on OpenAlexaff
Zelin Li, Gaofeng Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Fault Detection and Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltageSIGNAL (programming language)High voltageSwitched-mode power supplyElectrical engineeringPower supply rejection ratioVoltage dividerVoltage regulationVoltage optimisationElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The output voltage signals should be measured in real-time, and it is sent to a control system for feedback control and protection in the high-voltage power supply with high-voltage, strong magnetic field, or strong power condition. In order to obtain a stable output voltage and a rapid response of the protection in the high-voltage power supply system, the measurement of the voltage signal needs to meet three requirements: response in real-time, accurate, and high isolation. Using the voltage-to-frequency (V/F) converter AD650 to transmit the analog signals as frequency form through the digital optical fiber is the best mode to measuring the signals with high precision, real-time, long-distance, and high isolation. The composition and principle of the real-time voltage measuring device are described in this paper. The design of the hardware and the parameters are analyzed and discussed in detail. The experimental results show that the circuit structure based on the AD650 chip is simple. The optical fiber transmission can achieve high isolation and high accuracy (better than 0.1%). The low response time (under 30us) can meet the requirements of the real-time voltage signal measurement system. The signal will not be affected by the high electromagnetic field in the transmission process. The measurement system has been applied in the high voltage power supply with excellent linearity and high isolation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicElectrical Fault Detection and ProtectionFrench-language works237,207