MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant nivolumab and lirilumab in patients with recurrent, resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

2021· article· en· W3170115330 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Glenn J. Hanna, Anne O’Neill, Vickie Y. Jo, Kristine Wong, Patrick H. Lizotte, Donald J. Annino, Laura A. Goguen, Jason Kass, Eleni M. Rettig, Rosh K.V. Sethi, Jochen H. Lorch, Jonathan D. Schoenfeld, Danielle N. Margalit, Roy B. Tishler, Peter C. Everett, Anupam M. Desai, Cloud P. Paweletz, Ann Marie Egloff, Ravindra Uppaluri, Robert I. Haddad

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBristol-Myers Squibb Canada
KeywordsMedicineNivolumabInternal medicineOncologyClinical endpointAdjuvantImmunotherapyHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaNeoadjuvant therapySurgeryGastroenterologyHead and neck cancerCancerClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

6053 Background: Locoregional recurrence (LRR) is a major cause of death for patients (pts) with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). With therapy options limited by prior treatment, surgery often represents the best chance for disease control. Emerging data suggests a role for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in upfront resectable SCCHN and the importance of NK cells in the tumor microenvironment. We hypothesized that dual immune checkpoint inhibition (anti-PD-1, nivolumab [N] and anti-KIR, lirilumab [L]) before and after salvage surgery would improve 1-year disease-free survival (DFS). Methods: Pts with operable LRR of SCCHN (any HPV or smoking status) with a disease-free interval of > 8 weeks after curative intent therapy were eligible for this phase II trial. Pts received a single dose of pre-op N (240 mg) + L (240 mg) 7-21 days before surgery, followed by 6-cycles of adjuvant N+L on days 1, 15 (N alone) of a 28-day cycle (C) for C1-3; and on day 1 for C4-6. Primary endpoint was 1-year DFS; 37 DFS events among N = 54 pts provided 81% power to detect improvement in 1-year DFS from 57% to 67.5% (one-sided 10% Wald’s test). Secondary endpoints: safety, radiologic response (RECIST v1.1) to pre-op N+L, and overall survival (OS). Correlatives included tumor sequencing, PD-L1 status, and immunoprofiling. Results: Between 3/15/18 and 5/29/20, N = 29 enrolled (stopped due to expiration of drug supply). Among 28 treated pts, median age: 66, 18% (5/28) women, 83% smokers; primary site: 10 oral cavity, 8 oropharynx (5/8 HPV+), and 10 larynx/hypopharynx. 96% (27/28) had prior HN radiation; 71% (20/28) prior chemotherapy. There were no delays to surgery. Grade 3+ adverse events: 11% (3/28); no deaths from treatment. At time of surgery, 96% (27/28) had stable disease radiologically with 3 showing regression, 4% (1/28) had disease progression. Pathologic response to N+L was observed in 43% (12/28): 4/28 (14%) major (tumor viability, TV ≤10%); 8/28 (29%) partial (TV ≤50%). PD-L1 CPS at surgery was similar regardless of pathologic response (p = 0.63). 68% (19/28) completed all 6-cycles of adjuvant N+L; N = 1 came off for toxicity. Ten pts (36%) recurred (local = 8, distant = 2). 5/28 (18%) had positive margins, of which 4 (80%) recurred; 4/28 (14%) declined to start adjuvant N+L, of which 3 (75%) later recurred. At median follow-up of 20.2 months, 1-year DFS70% (95%CI, 48-84%) and 1-year OS: 85% (95%CI, 65-94%). Median tumor mutational burden was 4 (range, 1-11). TP53 was the most frequent alteration (78%, 21/27). CD39 expression by TILs and CD38 expression by circulating CD4/8+ T cells increased after N+L exposure (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant N+L was safe and well tolerated. We observed a 43% pathologic response rate prior to salvage surgery, with a favorable 1-year DFS of 70% and 1-year OS > 80% among previously irradiated pts. Further evaluation of this strategy is warranted (NCT03341936).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207