MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Differential regulation of baculoviral repeat containing protein 2 (BIRC2) and 3 (BIRC3) by inflammatory stimuli and glucocorticoids

2021· article· en· W3170193837 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrew Thorne, Mahmoud Mostafa, Akanksha Bansal, Robert Newton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGlucocorticoid receptorProinflammatory cytokineGene expressionGene silencingBiologyMessenger RNAMolecular biologyContext (archaeology)Cancer researchGlucocorticoidGeneInflammationEndocrinologyImmunologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Glucocorticoids (GCs) act, via the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) to, repress expression of many inflammatory genes and are widely used to treat inflammatory diseases. However, GCs also induce expression of some inflammatory genes. Examples include, BIRC3, and the closely related homolog, BIRC2. While, it is unclear why GCs may up‐regulate such genes, BIRC2 and BIRC3 are suggested to be functionally redundant E3 ubiquitin ligases that may contribute to inflammatory signaling cascades. In the current study pulmonary A549 cells are used as a model of airway epithelial cells to characterize the expression of BIRC2 and BIRC3 in the context of inflammatory stimuli and GCs. Methods A549 cells were treated for various times with dexamethasone (Dex), budesonide (Bud), IL1B and TNF alone or in combination. Concentration‐response analyses established maximally‐effective concentrations for Dex (1µM), Bud (333nM), IL1B (1ng/ml) and TNF (10ng/ml). Roles for GR and the NF‐κB pathway were interrogated by gene silencing, the GR receptor antagonist, Org34517, adenoviral‐mediated overexpression of a dominant inhibitor of NF‐κB, IκBαDN, or ATP binding‐site IκB kinase (IKK) inhibitors. Cells were harvested for: i) total RNA, prior to cDNA synthesis and qPCR analysis of gene expression; or ii) total proteins and western blot analysis. ChIP‐PCR for both GR and NF‐κB (RELA) was performed 1 h following IL1B, Bud IL1B+Bud. Results Low baseline expression of BIRC3 mRNA was induced 60‐, 25‐ or 10‐fold by IL1B, TNF, or GCs, respectively. Peak BIRC3 mRNA expression occurred at 4h for IL1B and TNF, but at 6‐24h for GCs. In each case, maximal BIRC3 protein expression occurred 6‐24h post‐treatment and this was unaffected by combination treatment (IL1B/Dex or TNF/Dex). While, BIRC2 mRNA was modestly induced by all stimuli (<5‐fold), protein expression was constitutive. Gene silencing and receptor antagonism by Org34517 confirmed a role for GR in BIRC3 expression induced by GCs. Likewise, silencing of the NF‐κB subunit, RELA, and the IKK2‐selective inhibitors, PS‐1145 or ML120B, reduced BIRC3 expression induced by IL1B. Additionally, complete loss of IL1B‐induced BIRC3 and BIRC2 mRNA expression was observed following overexpression of IκBαDN. Furthermore, ChIP‐PCR analysis confirmed IL1B‐induced binding of RELA and GC‐induced binding of GR upstream of the BIRC3 gene. Conclusions While our data show constitutive expression of BIRC2 protein, which may indicate an acute role in inflammatory signaling, the later induction of BIRC3 expression via an NF‐κB‐dependent mechanism suggests a delayed and possibly nonredundant function relative to BIRC2. The modest induction of BIRC3 expression by GCs involves the GR but is currently of unclear significance. Given there is no loss of GR or NF‐κB recruitment to the BIRC3 locus with co‐treatment by IL1B+GC, we propose roles for both factors in maintaining BIRC3 expression in the presence of an inflammatory stimulus plus a GC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207