MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3170218877 · doi:10.1139/cjz-2021-0040

Living on the edge: population parameters of the wedge clam <i>Donax hanleyanus</i> in the southernmost limit of its distribution range, southwestern Atlantic, Argentina

2021· article· en· W3170218877 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M.C. Risoli, Omar Defeo, Betina J. Lomovasky

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyRange (aeronautics)Biomass (ecology)EcologyProductivityPopulationSpecies distributionHabitatFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The wedge clam Donax hanleyanus Philippi, 1845 is a conspicuous member of the sandy beach macrofauna along hundreds of kilometres in the northern coasts of Argentina. Age, growth, mortality, and productivity of this species were assessed in the southernmost limit of its distribution range (Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires province, Argentina). The parameters of the von Bertalanffy growth function were SL∞ = 23.23 mm, K = 1.62 year−1, and t0 = 0.08 years. The maximum individual production was 7.9 × 10−7 g shell-free wet mass (SFWM)·year−1 at a shell length of 14–16 mm. Individuals between 10 and 12 mm contributed the most to the secondary production (P) of 0.01 g SFWM·m−2·year−1. The mean annual biomass (B) was 0.002 g SFWM·m−2·year−1. Annual P/B ratio and mortality coefficient (Z) were 4.48 year−1 and 4.78 year−1, respectively. Low production and high mortality could be caused by a sharp decrease in habitat quality, given the suboptimal temperatures at the southernmost edge of the species distribution. These results strongly limit its potential for future commercial exploitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207