A Tensor Framework for Multi-Linear Complex MMSE Estimation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tensors are higher order generalization of vectors and matrices which can be used to describe signals indexed by more than two indices. This paper introduces a tensor framework for minimum mean square error (MMSE) estimation for multi-domain signals and data using the Einstein Product. The framework addresses both proper and improper complex tensors. The multi-domain nature of tensors has been harnessed to provide an augmented representation of improper complex tensors to account for covariance and pseudo-covariance. The classical notions of linear and widely linear MMSE estimators are extended to tensor case leading to the notion of multi-linear and widely multi-linear MMSE estimation. The Tucker product based n-mode Wiener filtering approach more commonly used in tensor estimation has been shown to be a special case of the proposed multi-linear MMSE estimation. An application of the tensor based estimation in a multiple antenna Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (MIMO OFDM) system is presented where the tensor formulation allows a convenient treatment of inter-carrier interference. A comparison between the tensor estimation and per sub-carrier estimation used for MIMO OFDM is presented which shows a significant performance advantage of using the tensor framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".