The Early Adjustment for Weeks 1-8 of Korean and Multicultural Children to Preschool Institutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article compares the early adjustment process of full-Korean and multicultural children to preschool institutions and investigates the levels of adjustment of these students week to week. A total of 29 Korean children and 29 multicultural students attending preschools in Gwangju, Jeonnam provinces were selected to participate in this research, and their early adjustment was measured each week for a total of eight weeks. At the end of eight weeks, a difference in adjustment levels to daily routines between Korean and multicultural children was made manifest, and it was apparent from the first week that multicultural students struggled with self-perception in comparison to Korean children. Also, through the repetitive daily routines of preschool, both Korean and multicultural children overcame struggles in adjusting to prosocial behavioral expectations and working with peers, and their levels of adjustment each week were very similar. Accordingly, the routine of preschool must be treated as the children’s first experience with social life, and an educational support for helping multicultural children adjust to their first stable routine and to overcome struggles with self-perception must be implemented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".